| 1 |
Hi, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
Neil Bothwick schrieb: |
| 4 |
> On Sun, 01 Jun 2008 09:11:04 +0200, Marc Blumentritt wrote: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
>> [ Searching for file(s) env-update in *... ] |
| 7 |
>> sys-apps/portage-2.1.4.4 (/usr/sbin/env-update -> |
| 8 |
>> ../lib/portage/bin/env-update) |
| 9 |
>> sys-apps/portage-2.1.4.4 (/usr/lib/portage/bin/env-update) |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
>> portage provides env-update and env-update.sh, which is also provided |
| 13 |
>> my baselayout-1. But neither openrc nor baselayout-2 does provide |
| 14 |
>> env-update or env-update.sh. My problem is, |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> This is one of the risks of mixing stable and testing packages. |
| 17 |
> env-update and env-update.sh are provided by portage |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> % equery belongs env-update |
| 20 |
> [ Searching for file(s) env-update in *... ] |
| 21 |
> sys-apps/portage-2.1.5.2 (/usr/sbin/env-update |
| 22 |
> -> ../lib64/portage/bin/env-update) |
| 23 |
> sys-apps/portage-2.1.5.2 (/usr/lib64/portage/bin/env-update) |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Well, I know that portage provides env-update and env-update.sh. But an |
| 27 |
older version of baselayout-2 did provide it (as a symbolic link to |
| 28 |
/sbin/rc). |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
The question is, does Gentoo need env-update for proper booting? If yes, |
| 31 |
how does baselayout-2 work around this, since it does not provide |
| 32 |
env-update and does not depend upon portage? And how do you chroot into |
| 33 |
a baselayout-2 environment, where portage is not installed? |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
To make a long question short, is it a bug, that recent baselayout-2 |
| 36 |
does not provide env-update? |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
Regards, |
| 39 |
Marc |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
-- |
| 42 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives