1 |
Mark Knecht wrote: |
2 |
> On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> On Sunday 17 May 2009 19:10:05 bn wrote: |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>>> Dale ha scritto: |
7 |
>>> |
8 |
>>>> I hope someone wins the debate soon and gets this to work and be "user |
9 |
>>>> friendly". I'm about to make a fresh backup and try this again. I have |
10 |
>>>> upgraded my kernel to a really new version, 2.6.25. Sorry, nvidia won't |
11 |
>>>> compile with anything newer that I have tried. |
12 |
>>>> |
13 |
>>> Uh? last nvidia-drivers needs 2.6.25 kernel? |
14 |
>>> |
15 |
>> Dale has an old video card and needs one of the nvidia legacy driver releases. |
16 |
>> He finds that that release doesn't work with kernels after .25 |
17 |
>> |
18 |
> |
19 |
> Humm....now I'm getting interested. I just did an emerge -DuN world to |
20 |
> my dad's machine in Southern California last night. He's got a 6 year |
21 |
> old machine with an old nvidia card that's no longer supported by the |
22 |
> newest drivers so the emerge messages tell me that I have to use an |
23 |
> older legacy version of the driver. Thing is I have him on |
24 |
> gentoo-sources-2.6.29-r4 using nvidia-drivers-96.43.09. Everything |
25 |
> seems to be working from here. I see the driver in memory. I Can run X |
26 |
> apps remotely. |
27 |
> |
28 |
> gandalf ~ # uname -a |
29 |
> Linux gandalf 2.6.29-gentoo-r4 #3 PREEMPT Sun May 17 06:58:58 PDT 2009 |
30 |
> i686 AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2500+ AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux |
31 |
> gandalf ~ # |
32 |
> |
33 |
> gandalf ~ # emerge -pv nvidia-drivers |
34 |
> |
35 |
> These are the packages that would be merged, in order: |
36 |
> |
37 |
> Calculating dependencies... done! |
38 |
> [ebuild R ] x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-96.43.09 USE="acpi gtk |
39 |
> -custom-cflags (-multilib)" 0 kB |
40 |
> |
41 |
> Total: 1 package (1 reinstall), Size of downloads: 0 kB |
42 |
> gandalf ~ # |
43 |
> |
44 |
> I guess my question is whether he's going to have issues. He's really |
45 |
> bad about reporting this stuff to me and I'm not there to see the |
46 |
> screen or use the system. |
47 |
> |
48 |
> I don't see much in /var/log/Xorg.0.log other than a complaint about |
49 |
> GLX and freetype. freetype I can fix. GLX I haven't looked into. |
50 |
> |
51 |
> Any problems? |
52 |
> |
53 |
> Thanks, |
54 |
> Mark |
55 |
> |
56 |
> |
57 |
> |
58 |
|
59 |
Hey, we got a pretty similar rig here. I have a FX5200, made by |
60 |
Chaintech I think. Info alert: |
61 |
|
62 |
root@smoker / # uname -a |
63 |
Linux smoker 2.6.25-gentoo-r9 #3 PREEMPT Sat May 16 12:06:51 CDT 2009 |
64 |
i686 AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2500+ AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux |
65 |
root@smoker / # emerge -pv nvidia-drivers |
66 |
|
67 |
These are the packages that would be merged, in order: |
68 |
|
69 |
Calculating dependencies... done! |
70 |
[ebuild R ] x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-173.14.09 USE="acpi gtk |
71 |
-custom-cflags (-multilib)" 0 kB |
72 |
|
73 |
Total: 1 package (1 reinstall), Size of downloads: 0 kB |
74 |
root@smoker / # lspci | grep VGA |
75 |
02:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NV34 [GeForce FX |
76 |
5200] (rev a1) |
77 |
root@smoker / # |
78 |
|
79 |
My drivers appears to be a little newer but you may have a older card |
80 |
than me. If so, my sympathies. ;-) There is a newer version of the |
81 |
173.* series but it wouldn't compile either. I think this is the only |
82 |
version that works. That goodness it does a good job. |
83 |
|
84 |
Dale |
85 |
|
86 |
:-) :-) |