1 |
Daniel Iliev <daniel.iliev <at> gmail.com> writes: |
2 |
|
3 |
|
4 |
|
5 |
> > I´m waiting for too. |
6 |
|
7 |
> Why? |
8 |
|
9 |
> In other words I don't need too many releases, but prefer the devs |
10 |
> spend their time for Gentoo on killing :) bugs and filling portage with |
11 |
> new software instead of taking snapshots and building CD/DVD images. |
12 |
|
13 |
Well, I think that fixing that abortion of an installation CD |
14 |
is of paramount concern. Like it or not, the first thing prospective |
15 |
new users see, is the installation process. In my opinion, it |
16 |
is of quintessential importance for Gentoo to have a normal, |
17 |
functional, easy installation CD. |
18 |
|
19 |
I've been using Gentoo since 2004. I know graduate students in Computer |
20 |
Science that use Ubuntu in lieu of Gentoo, solely based on the |
21 |
nightmare that installing Gentoo via a normal graphical install |
22 |
CD is.... |
23 |
|
24 |
If you do not like my opinion, you should look at what Daniel Robbins |
25 |
had to say, as I ran across a posting of his today, about this very |
26 |
issue. An awesome collection of techies does not gravitate users |
27 |
to join the ranks of distro users. A (easy) graphical installation |
28 |
method is a requirement. Gentoo get's tons of bad reviews, |
29 |
based on the installation process. |
30 |
|
31 |
Yes I've installed dozens of gentoo system, and the resulting |
32 |
product is wonderful, much akin to a girl with a great personality. |
33 |
However, she ain't every going to get 'laid' (become popular) |
34 |
because the (installation) process is *UGLY*. |
35 |
|
36 |
|
37 |
Let us first be honest about this, so it can be fixed. At that |
38 |
point ( a normal installation CD), Gentoo can take it's |
39 |
rightful place as a major distro.... |
40 |
|
41 |
ymmv, |
42 |
|
43 |
James |
44 |
|
45 |
|
46 |
|
47 |
|
48 |
-- |
49 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |