| 1 |
On Fri, 29 Dec 2006, maxim wexler wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> > Will audacious not work for you? |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> Haven't tried yet. Fellow down the list says it's a |
| 6 |
> resource hog like mplayer. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
I don't have xmms any more to compare against, but audacious seems to be |
| 9 |
almost identical to it as far as I can tell. As far as memory usage, it's |
| 10 |
much less than, say, firefox. It is presently at the top of my CPU usage, |
| 11 |
but it's still only taking 1% of the CPU, so it's hard to complain. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
-Daniel |
| 14 |
*This .sig left intentionally blank* |
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives