1 |
Philip Webb wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> When I run 'lshw', the memory lines come out as : |
4 |
> |
5 |
> *-bank:0 |
6 |
> description: DIMM Synchronous 1872 MHz (0.5 ns) |
7 |
> product: PartNum0 |
8 |
> vendor: Manufacturer0 |
9 |
> physical id: 0 |
10 |
> serial: SerNum0 |
11 |
> slot: DIMM0 |
12 |
> size: 512MiB |
13 |
> width: 64 bits |
14 |
> clock: 1872MHz (0.5ns) |
15 |
> |
16 |
> This looks like WK's output rather than Dale's more limited version. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> It also doesn't match the spec of the memory when I bought it, |
19 |
> which I recorded in my own files as : |
20 |
> |
21 |
> 071009 Memory : Kingston 2 x 512 kit DDR2 1150 PC2 9200 : 124.99 |
22 |
> |
23 |
> The specs are at (they seem to have dropped the 512 MB version) |
24 |
> |
25 |
> http://www.valueram.com/datasheets/KHX9200D2_1G.pdf |
26 |
> |
27 |
> which seems to confirm my own record. |
28 |
> |
29 |
> The speed was supposedly 1150 MHz , but 'lshw' gives 1872 MHz . |
30 |
> Of course, I'm not complaining if it's faster than advertised (smile), |
31 |
> but does anyone have any comments re the 2 differences in output ? |
32 |
> |
33 |
> |
34 |
|
35 |
Well, I suspect it may be the age of my mobo. I have a Abit NF7 rev 2.0 |
36 |
which has been around a while. It may be that other peoples mobo is |
37 |
newer and has some "enhancements" that my old rig doesn't have. I have |
38 |
always found that age is the reason for things acting different. I need |
39 |
a new rig. o_O |
40 |
|
41 |
I to would be interested in knowing if it is something else causing |
42 |
this. Could it be that some mobos report differently? Could it be |
43 |
something to do with the chipset being used? |
44 |
|
45 |
Dale |
46 |
|
47 |
:-) :-) |
48 |
-- |
49 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |