| 1 |
On Mon, 21 May 2012 20:52:01 -0700, Chris Stankevitz wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Question: Is is true that the RUBY dependencies listed in the above |
| 4 |
> paste link are entirely due to adding documentation support |
| 5 |
> (specifically rdoc)? If so, can I tell portage to not install the rdoc |
| 6 |
> stuff? I have USE=-doc already. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Yes, this is true. We do this because normally ruby contains a copy of |
| 9 |
rdoc. We unbundle that and thus the external rdoc implementation is |
| 10 |
installed. You can control this with the rdoc USE flag on dev-lang/ruby, |
| 11 |
but note that not installing rdoc is probably considered broken by |
| 12 |
upstream. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Kind regards, |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Hans |
Archives