| 1 |
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 09:43, Alan Mckinnon wrote: |
| 2 |
> I believe the gcc ebuild does do a bootstrap compile, which does imply |
| 3 |
> that emerge -e system is redundant. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> But, we had a huge long rambling thread on this point recently which I'd |
| 6 |
> rather not rehash again :-) and IIRC the general consensus was that |
| 7 |
> 'emerge -e system ; emerge -e world' was the way to go, for reasons |
| 8 |
> broader than just gcc. I forget the details, maybe we should both check |
| 9 |
> the archives. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Back then we were speaking of a gcc upgrade in which case Richard doesn't |
| 12 |
disagree with the emerge -e system step which is also mentioned in [1]. We |
| 13 |
were definitely NOT talking about a minor modification of CFLAGS between -Os |
| 14 |
and -O3! That's where you're wrong. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
[1] http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gcc-upgrading.xml |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Bo Andresen |
Archives