| 1 |
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Marc Stürmer <mail@×××××××××××××.de> wrote: |
| 2 |
> Zitat von Tom H <tomh0665@×××××.com>: |
| 3 |
>> |
| 4 |
>> Lennart claims that the embedded world loves systemd. I suspect that, |
| 5 |
>> as in other corners of the Linux world, there are lovers and haters of |
| 6 |
>> systemd. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Embedded systems also quite often means low on resources, CPU power, memory, |
| 9 |
> space. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> If you are using hard space constrained systems, the sheer size of systemd |
| 12 |
> in the file system can be a valid reason not to use it at all. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> So it does depend on the type of embedded system you are looking at. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Sure. My point was that anyone can claim that systemd is (un)popular |
| 17 |
in the embedded space. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Samsung's starting to release Tizen-driven phones, TVs, white goods, |
| 20 |
etc. Tizen uses systemd and, given the size of Samsung, the number of |
| 21 |
systemd embedded devices is going to skyrocket in the next few years. |
| 22 |
Samsung wouldn't have chosen systemd for Tizen if it were too resource |
| 23 |
hungry for its use case. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
There might be devices where systemd's too fat to be wedged in but |
| 26 |
it's unfortunately going to be difficult to know whether this is |
| 27 |
really the case or whether that determination's shaded by an |
| 28 |
anti-systemd bias. :( |
Archives