| 1 |
On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 17:54:34 +0200 |
| 2 |
Dirk Heinrichs <dirk.heinrichs@××××××.de> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Am Dienstag 16 Juni 2009 15:58:37 schrieb Philipp Riegger: |
| 5 |
[-snip-] |
| 6 |
> > Another solution would be to use ndb (network block devices), |
| 7 |
> > dm-raid and a cluster filesystem. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> And finally, there's OpenAFS. Not really RAID, but maybe sufficient. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Bye... |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Dirk |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Perhaps. The unfortunate thing is that the answers can't be more |
| 17 |
accurate than the question itself, but many times the OPs liberty to |
| 18 |
reveal details is limited by some kind of NDA. In this particular case |
| 19 |
a key detail is missing: which is more important - the traffic costs or |
| 20 |
the hardware costs. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Best regards, |
| 24 |
Daniel |
Archives