| 1 |
On 7/28/07, Tim Allingham <deserted@×××××××××××.au> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> On Sun, 2007-07-29 at 09:39 +1000, Tim Allingham wrote: |
| 4 |
> > I don't actually run 4GB of RAM in any of my intel systems, so I can't |
| 5 |
> > comment from experience, however my suspicion would be the overhead |
| 6 |
> > introduced from PAE, which (at least on older kernels) requires some |
| 7 |
> > processing overhead to utilise. Are you able to try a 64-bit install to |
| 8 |
> > determine if this is the case? |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > Regards, |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > Tim Allingham |
| 13 |
> > Email:Tim@××××××××××××××××.au |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> just to add, this page gives a reasonable explanation of the problems |
| 16 |
> with 32-bit OS's trying to address large RAM volumes |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> http://www.dansdata.com/askdan00015.htm |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
That is very very very sad... |
| 22 |
The fact is I can't use 64bits for now... So let's take one gig out! |
| 23 |
Thanks for your help!!!! |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Daniel |
Archives