| 1 |
Am Fri, 09 Feb 2018 10:58:35 +0000 schrieb Neil Bothwick: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On Fri, 09 Feb 2018 10:12:01 +0000, Peter Humphrey wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> > Why mess around with another tmpfs? Just set PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/tmp" in |
| 6 |
>> > make.conf. Job done! |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> Acting on the advice of various Gentoo guides, I have this: |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> # grep tmp /etc/fstab tmpfs /var/tmp/portage tmpfs |
| 11 |
>> noatime,uid=portage,gid=portage,mode=0775 0 0 tmpfs /tmp |
| 12 |
>> tmpfs noatime,nosuid,nodev,noexec,mode=1777 0 0 |
| 13 |
>> |
| 14 |
>> Are you saying I don't gain anything from it? |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> I can't see any benefit from the added complexity. If you want portage |
| 17 |
> to use a tmpfs for its temporary directory, why not use one that is |
| 18 |
> already there? |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
The point here is having /tmp as noexec. That's not exactly what I'd call |
| 21 |
added complexity. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
Regards, |
| 26 |
Kai |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Replies to list-only preferred. |
Archives