1 |
Am Sat, 10 Feb 2018 19:38:56 +0000 schrieb Wols Lists: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On 10/02/18 18:56, Kai Krakow wrote: |
4 |
>> role and /usr takes the role of /, and /home already took the role of |
5 |
>> /usr (that's why it's called /usr, it was user data in early unix). The |
6 |
> |
7 |
> Actually no, not at all. /usr is not short for USeR, it's an acronym for |
8 |
> User System Resources, which is why it contains OS stuff, not user |
9 |
> stuff. Very confusing, I know. |
10 |
|
11 |
From https://www.tldp.org/LDP/Linux-Filesystem-Hierarchy/html/usr.html: |
12 |
|
13 |
> In the original Unix implementations, /usr was where the home |
14 |
> directories of the users were placed (that is to say, /usr/someone was |
15 |
> then the directory now known as /home/someone). In current Unices, /usr |
16 |
> is where user-land programs and data (as opposed to 'system land' |
17 |
> programs and data) are. The name hasn't changed, but it's meaning has |
18 |
> narrowed and lengthened from "everything user related" to "user usable |
19 |
> programs and data". As such, some people may now refer to this |
20 |
> directory as meaning 'User System Resources' and not 'user' as was |
21 |
> originally intended. |
22 |
|
23 |
So, actually the acronym was only invented later to represent the new |
24 |
role of the directory. ;-) |
25 |
|
26 |
|
27 |
-- |
28 |
Regards, |
29 |
Kai |
30 |
|
31 |
Replies to list-only preferred. |