1 |
On Friday, 20 October 2017 16:35:34 BST Ian Zimmerman wrote: |
2 |
> On 2017-10-20 10:08, Mick wrote: |
3 |
> > I suspect something in my configuration has deviated from vanilla and |
4 |
> > this is causing the problem of 'set crypt_use_gpgme' not being enough. |
5 |
> > This is what I'm running here: |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > mail-client/mutt-1.7.2 |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > I haven't tried troubleshooting gpgme when running mutt to see what |
10 |
> > the logs spew out. xsession-errors and syslog does not reveal |
11 |
> > anything. I should give this some attention when I get a free moment. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> Classic mutt had known problems in this area. For example, from the |
14 |
> mutt.org frontpage: |
15 |
> |
16 |
> Mutt 1.8.2 was released on April 18, 2017. This is a bug-fix release, |
17 |
> fixing a regression involving GnuPG agent in the 1.8.1 release. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> You may want to try upgrading to latest (1.9.1), or to neomutt if you |
20 |
> feel like an adventure. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> Otherwise, if you really want to debug your current configuration, I |
23 |
> would start by commenting out the gpgme line. That should give you the |
24 |
> original environment where mutt interacts with GPG directly; one fewer |
25 |
> variable to consider. Then, once you get that working, uncomment gpgme |
26 |
> and comment out all the hairy gpg command lines. |
27 |
|
28 |
LOL! You made me laugh! |
29 |
|
30 |
I've highjacked to some extent the OP's request, but since his problem was |
31 |
fixed by using gpgme I guess I could carry on. |
32 |
|
33 |
I have no problem using gpg with mutt as long as I include the "hairy gpg |
34 |
command lines". :-) The gpgme line alone does not work on my current |
35 |
version. I will update to a later version soon and then see what I get. |
36 |
|
37 |
Thank you for your help. |
38 |
-- |
39 |
Regards, |
40 |
Mick |