1 |
Daevid Vincent wrote: |
2 |
>> -----Original Message----- |
3 |
>> From: Philip Webb [mailto:purslow@×××××××××.ca] |
4 |
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 3:07 PM |
5 |
>> To: gentoo-user@l.g.o |
6 |
>> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Why is portage trying to pull in |
7 |
>> xorg when I don't use it... |
8 |
>> |
9 |
>> 060329 Daevid Vincent wrote: |
10 |
>> > I have a VMWare that I use for LAMP development. |
11 |
>> > I have never put Xorg on it nor do I ever want X windows on it. |
12 |
>> > Recently, when I do an 'emerge -Davut world', I see this: |
13 |
>> -- snip -- |
14 |
>> > [ebuild U ] www-client/links-2.1_pre20 [2.1_pre19] -X |
15 |
>> -directfb -fbcon |
16 |
>> > +gpm -javascript +jpeg -livecd +png +sdl +ssl -svga +tiff |
17 |
>> -unicode 3,768 kB |
18 |
>> -- snip -- |
19 |
>> > [ebuild N ] x11-terms/xterm-207 -Xaw3d -doc -toolbar |
20 |
>> +truetype -unicode |
21 |
>> > 727 kB |
22 |
>> > What is trying to bring in all those NEW x11 packages? |
23 |
>> > How can I prevent this annoyance? |
24 |
>> |
25 |
>> It's clearer if you do 'emerge -etp links', which requires |
26 |
>> all the GUI stuff |
27 |
> |
28 |
> OMG! 'links' pulls in _92_ package dependencies?! That's silly. |
29 |
|
30 |
No, it's not silly. It's good. |
31 |
|
32 |
> What confuses me even more now, is that AFAIK, "links" is (according to the |
33 |
> man page) "lynx-like alternative character mode WWW browser", so why then |
34 |
> all the x11 dependencies and such. Shouldn't this thing, by definition, just |
35 |
> work in console mode without all that extra crap? |
36 |
|
37 |
No, it shouldn't. It should work with all the flags that you |
38 |
set. |
39 |
|
40 |
> I "solved" this by adding this to /etc/portage/package.use: |
41 |
> |
42 |
> www-client/links -X -directfb -fbcon gpm -javascript -jpeg -livecd -png -sdl |
43 |
> ssl -svga -tiff -unicode |
44 |
> |
45 |
> But what seems silly to me is that why does this have jpeg, png, tiff |
46 |
> support if it's in console mode? |
47 |
|
48 |
No, that's not silly. |
49 |
|
50 |
> Will "links" actually SHOW an image? |
51 |
|
52 |
Yes, it will. |
53 |
|
54 |
|
55 |
> I've |
56 |
> NEVER seen it do that (on any other linux box, even with X support) |
57 |
|
58 |
Fine - so, what? |
59 |
|
60 |
Alexander Skwar |
61 |
-- |
62 |
"I have to convince you, or at least snow you ..." |
63 |
-- Prof. Romas Aleliunas, CS 435 |
64 |
-- |
65 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |