| 1 |
On Fri, 02 Oct 2009 13:35:47 +0300, "Arthur D." <spinal.by@××××.ru> wrote: |
| 2 |
>> Oh, and your ebuild patch doesn't even bother to check the vim |
| 3 |
>> dependency. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> The "vanilla" USE flag is not global, it's local, man. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
That's irrelevant. Each ebuild should sort its dependencies. The scope of |
| 8 |
the use flags is irrelevant. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
> And it doesn't force user to install vim. |
| 11 |
> You may want to make symlink /usr/bin/vi -> /bin/busybox instead. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Right, you were complaining because it didn't work out of the box, but now |
| 14 |
you don't care about that? |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I fail to understand that reasoning. Oh, yes, I understand it: it doesn't |
| 17 |
matter because *you* have vim installed so it won't bother you. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
I'd like to see why for you it's acceptable to symlink a file manually but |
| 20 |
it's not acceptable to configure sudo... I also wonder what's the |
| 21 |
difference between sudo complaining that it can be find nano and sudo |
| 22 |
complaining that it can't find vim. So, if it can't find vim, we should go |
| 23 |
fix that ourselves and that is acceptable, but if it can't find nano then |
| 24 |
that's unacceptable for you, did I get it right? |
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Jesús Guerrero |
Archives