| 1 |
On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 16:10:41 +0100 |
| 2 |
Anthoine Bourgeois <anthoine.bourgeois@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> 2012/2/20 Mark Knecht <markknecht@×××××.com>: |
| 5 |
> > I've never seen this message about 'Remaining bundled dependencies' |
| 6 |
> > before. Just curious as to whether this is significant in any way to |
| 7 |
> > me as a user or is it just a message that the ebuild developer has |
| 8 |
> > put there for development reasons? |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > Full disclosure: This is from a package built using an overlay and |
| 11 |
> > not from the standard repositories. |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > Thanks, |
| 14 |
> > Mark |
| 15 |
> > |
| 16 |
> > |
| 17 |
> > * Remaining bundled dependencies: |
| 18 |
> > * - extern/eltopo |
| 19 |
> > * - extern/libredcode |
| 20 |
> > * - extern/lzo |
| 21 |
> > * - extern/binreloc |
| 22 |
> > * - extern/lzma |
| 23 |
> > * - extern/recastnavigation |
| 24 |
> > * - extern/libmv |
| 25 |
> > |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> No, it's not significant for you. It's more like a todo list for me. |
| 28 |
> I'll remove this warning message to avoid a misunderstanding. |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Like Mark says, it's better if you leave it in. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
It's not annoying - what it does is give us users warm and fuzzies that |
| 34 |
the maintainer actually looks at it and takes the trouble to document |
| 35 |
important things still to be done. |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
I often wish I see more things like that. |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
-- |
| 41 |
Alan McKinnnon |
| 42 |
alan.mckinnon@×××××.com |
Archives