1 |
Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> > People who believe that there is a problem use a wrong interpretation of the |
4 |
> > GPL. The CDDL definitely does not prevent combinations with other software. |
5 |
> |
6 |
> The problem is not with CDDL, the problem is with the GPL. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> ZFS in the kernel requires that ZFS as shipped be relicensed as GPL, it |
9 |
> forms a derivative work of the kernel. No external license can change |
10 |
> the terms of the GPL. |
11 |
|
12 |
The law can! |
13 |
|
14 |
The GPL is in conflict with the law and therefore the parts you have in mind |
15 |
are just void. |
16 |
|
17 |
BTW: I am still waiting for a legally acceptable explanation on why the GPL |
18 |
should be compatible to the BSD license. Note that the BSD license is very |
19 |
liberal, but it definitely does not permit to relicense code that was published |
20 |
under the BSD license withour written permission of the Copyright holder. |
21 |
|
22 |
So is the problem just a social problem given the fact that Linux comes with |
23 |
BSD licensed parts? |
24 |
|
25 |
Jörg |
26 |
|
27 |
-- |
28 |
EMail:joerg@××××××××××××××××××××××××.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin |
29 |
js@××××××××××××.de (uni) |
30 |
joerg.schilling@××××××××××××××××.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ |
31 |
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily |