1 |
Michael Jones wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> Again, no animosity against anyone: |
4 |
> |
5 |
> But Rich, Linux-4.19.97 was released on Jan 17th, and then |
6 |
> gentoo-sources-4.19.97 was released on Jan 18th, |
7 |
> whereas https://bugs.gentoo.org/706036 was acknowledged to be fixed by |
8 |
> Linux-4.19.99 on Jan 29th, and it's now Feb 9th and no newer |
9 |
> gentoo-sources package has been stabilized. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> So we've got some inconsistency in how the gentoo-sources package is |
12 |
> stabilized. You don't mind going directly with the upstream package, |
13 |
> but I personally do, which is why I used the gentoo-sources package |
14 |
> for my kernel needs in large part because I have trust in the Gentoo |
15 |
> distribution to provide that small but crucial extra layer of insider |
16 |
> knowledge on how likely a particular upstream kernel release is going |
17 |
> to break my systems. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> I certainly don't have a relationship with Gentoo where I pay money to |
20 |
> someone and expect some kind of service level guarantees, so honestly |
21 |
> this email is just a lot of hot-air. But if Gentoo wants to provide |
22 |
> good experiences to end users who are updating their kernels, I |
23 |
> personally think it's worth considering the release cadance and |
24 |
> whether the currently used one is the right fit for the actual goals |
25 |
> of the project. |
26 |
> |
27 |
> I'm not saying the current cadance isn't the right one, and i'm not |
28 |
> saying it is. I'm just saying in this particular situation, it didn't |
29 |
> fit one specific end-users needs, and maybe that's fine, and maybe |
30 |
> it's not. I'm not the one putting in the work, so I'm not going to say |
31 |
> the project *should* take an action. Just point out that there was a |
32 |
> problem from my perspective. |
33 |
> |
34 |
|
35 |
There is a kernel mailing list that posts when there is updates. You |
36 |
may want to subscribe to that and if nothing else, just monitor it for |
37 |
when there is new updates. I'm not sure but I think you can reply/post |
38 |
to that list as well if there is a question or problem. |
39 |
|
40 |
You can subscribe by emailing this address just like you did for this |
41 |
mailing list. |
42 |
|
43 |
gentoo-kernel+subscribe@l.g.o |
44 |
|
45 |
Hope that helps. |
46 |
|
47 |
Dale |
48 |
|
49 |
:-) :-) |