1 |
On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 07:51:17PM +0200, Davide Carnovale wrote: |
2 |
> Hi all gentoo people! |
3 |
> I've been away from gentoo for a while, and I'm in the process of |
4 |
> reinstalling it today. |
5 |
> While downloading the stage 3 I noticed that only an i486 version is |
6 |
> available. As far as I remember, gentoo was best known, back in the |
7 |
> days, for being fast, as it was one of the first distro to support |
8 |
> i686... am i wrong with this? if not, why only i486 today? |
9 |
> |
10 |
> apart from the reasons behind the decision of shipping only an i486 |
11 |
> stage 3, do you think it's worth the pain to recompile everything |
12 |
> (like the old stage1) for a different arch? i have an intel i5 |
13 |
> processor. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> regards |
16 |
> |
17 |
> Davide |
18 |
|
19 |
Hi Davide, |
20 |
|
21 |
The directories I checked read: |
22 |
http://gentoo.osuosl.org/releases/x86/autobuilds/current-stage3-i686/ |
23 |
but the tarball states it's hardened: |
24 |
http://gentoo.osuosl.org/releases/x86/autobuilds/current-stage3-i686/stage3-i686-hardened-20130326.tar.bz2 |
25 |
|
26 |
Haven't personally used a x86 in years. |
27 |
-- |
28 |
Happy Penguin Computers >') |
29 |
126 Fenco Drive ( \ |
30 |
Tupelo, MS 38801 ^^ |
31 |
support@×××××××××××××××××××××.com |
32 |
662-269-2706 662-205-6424 |
33 |
http://happypenguincomputers.com/ |
34 |
|
35 |
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. |
36 |
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? |
37 |
A: Top-posting. |
38 |
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? |
39 |
|
40 |
Don't top-post: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_post#Top-posting |