| 1 |
On Mon, 02 Dec 2013 22:24:35 +0200 |
| 2 |
Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> emerge -avuND world |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
/me slaps forehead. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Of course. :( |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Why 5.16.1? that is the lowest version that is ~arch; your next sync |
| 12 |
> and update is going to want to upgrade it anyway. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Ah, well, I'm not running ~arch anywhere and so not sure why my public |
| 15 |
server got 5.16.1 to begin. So, I'm just updating the development |
| 16 |
machine to match. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Lots of things have been moving around in perl land, modules moving |
| 20 |
> into core etc etc. A proper world update takes care of all the |
| 21 |
> necessary blockers. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Yes. Perl surely is a PITA for the distro to maintain. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> Or, seeing as you are going to remerge everything perl related anyway, |
| 27 |
> you might as well just undelete everything perl-related (keeping an |
| 28 |
> accurate list), and then merge the whole lot back |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
This kind of on-the-side bookkeeping is exactly what I'm trying to |
| 31 |
avoid. But I do get your point. ;-) |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
Looks like I'm good to go, as perl is updating and perl-cleaner --all |
| 34 |
after the fact should be fine, I'm guessing. And if not, I know what |
| 35 |
I'm in for, mostly. |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
Thanks! |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
Cheers, |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
- Michael |
Archives