1 |
Rich Freeman wrote: |
2 |
> On Sun, Apr 21, 2019 at 6:42 AM Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
>> A laser printer is *much* more economical to run than inkjets. The toner |
4 |
>> cartridges never dry out - with inkjet you often replace the ink before it has |
5 |
>> run out, because it has dried out. Initially you pay more for a laser, but |
6 |
>> over the years you will recuperate your investment in lower running costs. |
7 |
> You will pay for it VERY quickly. A good color laser costs $200. An |
8 |
> inkjet plus the first set of cartridges, which will last six months |
9 |
> together, will cost you $100-150 (one way or another - either with a |
10 |
> cheap printer with super-expensive cartridges, or an expensive printer |
11 |
> with more reasonable cartridges). |
12 |
> |
13 |
> There is a reason just about any company with professional IT uses |
14 |
> laser printers. They're just way cheaper to operate long-term, and |
15 |
> really long-term works out to be something like a year. They also |
16 |
> don't print photos (more on that below). |
17 |
> |
18 |
> If you have a family then laser printers also are worth it for peace |
19 |
> of mind. Inkjets are a maintenance nightmare, and they tend to |
20 |
> contribute to spouses becoming a maintenance nightmare. They seem to |
21 |
> ALWAYS need unclogging or tweaking or whatever, and of course every |
22 |
> time you hit that clean button you can just feel money draining out of |
23 |
> your wallet. A laser printer just needs to be fed new toner when a |
24 |
> cartridge empties, which is rare and takes two minutes. Occasionally |
25 |
> they will jam, and usually the paper path is very easy to access and |
26 |
> clear. |
27 |
> |
28 |
>> However, the quality of printing pictures is something you ought to check |
29 |
>> before you buy. As a rule, inkjets with their liquid ink, print better colour |
30 |
>> pictures than a comparable laser. Professional laser printers for thousands |
31 |
>> of dollars are better than what you're thinking of buying, but even then they |
32 |
>> won't match the colour flow and finish of a good quality inkjet. So, consider |
33 |
>> your use case and go to a shop to try-before-you-buy, because a laser printer |
34 |
>> may not be your optimal choice. |
35 |
> If you care about photos, laser printers are useless. So are "cheap" |
36 |
> inkjets, and they aren't cheap either. |
37 |
> |
38 |
> If you care about photos I almost always tell people to just have them |
39 |
> printed commercially. Walmart is just fine for what most people care |
40 |
> about, and their service will exceed the quality of any sub-$150-200 |
41 |
> inkjet easily. A better service will simply be unbeatable by any |
42 |
> reasonable home printer and will still be cheaper than most inkjet |
43 |
> solutions. |
44 |
> |
45 |
> Now, if you print a LOT of photos then a higher-end inkjet might be a |
46 |
> worthwhile investment, especially if printing on demand is |
47 |
> commercially valuable for you. The higher-end printers combined with |
48 |
> quality ink/paper can turn out a very good product and they're |
49 |
> reasonable economical to operate because the ink is cheap and there |
50 |
> probably are upwards of 10+ individual tanks in them, or they may |
51 |
> support bulk ink out of the box. However, you have to print often |
52 |
> enough to go through a set of cartridges every six months or so, |
53 |
> because they still have a shelf life, and if you're throwing away 10% |
54 |
> used cartridges your cost per page goes WAY up. |
55 |
> |
56 |
> And make no mistake, one way or another decent photos cost money to |
57 |
> print. If you print high-volume with a good printer at home maybe |
58 |
> that $10 print online only costs $7-8 to DIY. Photos go through a LOT |
59 |
> of ink. When you see those stats about pages per cartridge they |
60 |
> generally assume 5% coverage, and a photo is 100% coverage, and of |
61 |
> course you have to use photo paper on top of that. If you aren't |
62 |
> draining those cartridges completely before they dry up then your cost |
63 |
> goes up, and any savings evaporate. They might be worth it for |
64 |
> convenience, but you're paying for it. |
65 |
> |
66 |
> So, I would still generally advocate the laser printer for most |
67 |
> people, augmented by commercial photo printing when needed. Also, |
68 |
> think about whether you REALLY need color - the complexity of the |
69 |
> printer goes up significantly with color and the cost to operate - a |
70 |
> monochrome laser will be much cheaper to operate. |
71 |
> |
72 |
> Right now I'm at the point where I don't even have a working printer. |
73 |
> My postscript color laser needs a new image drum and I just can't see |
74 |
> one paying for itself. I can print at work if I need to, or if I'm in |
75 |
> a hurry I can pay the outrageous $0.10/page at Staples (just email a |
76 |
> PDF to an address and you get an access code to print the document on |
77 |
> demand). Since a good quality printer easily costs half that already |
78 |
> the break-even time to DIY would be quite long, though there is |
79 |
> certainly a convenience factor having a printer at home. I just don't |
80 |
> have that compulsion to print stuff out. If anything I do the reverse |
81 |
> - scanning any paper I'm given and shredding it. |
82 |
> |
83 |
> -- |
84 |
> Rich |
85 |
> |
86 |
> |
87 |
|
88 |
|
89 |
Thanks to both for the info. I usually use online picture developers or |
90 |
local ones. Why, I like the old style of processing of film. I've seen |
91 |
some inkjet printed images have issues in the recent past. Some are |
92 |
better then others of course but as I get older, I want pictures that |
93 |
can survive more bad storage. As some know, my Mom had been sick for a |
94 |
long time. She passed away a few weeks ago, which is why I haven't been |
95 |
posting much recently. Trying to sort through pictures, I can tell |
96 |
which were done on some sort of inkjet printer and which were done the |
97 |
old way. Heck, I soaked some of the old processed pictures in water to |
98 |
get them to turn lose and almost all of them separated just fine. The |
99 |
ones that were printed with inkjet type printers didn't do well at all. |
100 |
Of course, those old Polaroids didn't even stick at all. Besides, there |
101 |
are places where a 5x7 picture is only $0.12 to $0.15 or I could buy a |
102 |
dedicated printer just for photos. My sis-n-law has one and she said it |
103 |
works pretty well. I'd want to do some testing to see just how much |
104 |
abuse they can stand tho. |
105 |
|
106 |
This is why I was looking mainly at HP, Lexmark and a couple other |
107 |
brands. I've read some stories on Brother not having the best driver |
108 |
support as well as a couple others, I think some Epsons have issues as |
109 |
well. I wanted to find out if a particular printer works or not before |
110 |
I spent money on one. It sounds like that as long as a printer supports |
111 |
a few languages, it has a better chance of working easily. I don't care |
112 |
about brand as much as I do that it just plain works and will not be a |
113 |
piece of junk like the old inkjet printers that I want to get away from. |
114 |
|
115 |
A reason I want to print, for when there is no power here to run |
116 |
computers. We have occasions where due to storms etc we don't have |
117 |
power. It isn't often but when it comes time to eat, a recipe on the |
118 |
puter that I can't cut on isn't much help. A recipe book that I printed |
119 |
tho, that works, even if by candle light. lol Plus, sometimes I want |
120 |
to print something for friends that want printed copies, usually |
121 |
recipes. As it is, I send them a copy and they take it to work etc to |
122 |
print. ;-) |
123 |
|
124 |
I'm starting to warm up to that Lexmark. I really like the price on |
125 |
that second link in other post. I can take the savings and buy a full |
126 |
set of cartridges, high yield ones. While on those. I thought about |
127 |
putting the printer in another room that isn't as climate controlled as |
128 |
my bedroom is. How does the printers do in rooms like that? It gets a |
129 |
bit warm in the summer and cool in the winter. It doesn't get down to |
130 |
freezing or anything but does get pretty cool. I'm just curious if the |
131 |
toner might mess up in temps that are cooler or warmer than normal. |
132 |
Also, should the printer be left on all the time or only on when is |
133 |
use? I recall a friend ages ago that was told to leave his on so that |
134 |
the toner would get clumpy or something. It's been a long time ago so |
135 |
can't recall what the problem was. |
136 |
|
137 |
Thanks so much for the info, both of you. |
138 |
|
139 |
Dale |
140 |
|
141 |
:-) :-) |