| 1 |
On Monday 26 March 2007 22:38, Zac Medico wrote: |
| 2 |
> Mick wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Monday 26 March 2007 21:34, Mick wrote: |
| 4 |
> > The thing is that neither of them have arts in their USE flags. I am not |
| 5 |
> > I understand what is happening here. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> kde-base/noatun-3.5.5 currently has an unconditional runtime |
| 8 |
> dependency on kde-base/arts (at least that's what the ebuild |
| 9 |
> metadata currently specifies). If that package can build and run |
| 10 |
> without arts, then the unconditional dependency can be converted to |
| 11 |
> a conditional dependency that is controlled by the arts USE flag. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
I'm convinced that I am too tired to understand this because I noticed I have |
| 14 |
been missing out words in my response (sorry!). Would you mind simplifying |
| 15 |
it for me? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
I have rebuilt noatune and krec with "-arts" set in make.conf. Does this |
| 18 |
change the dependencies they have on arts? Or is it "unconditional" in the |
| 19 |
sense that noatune *always* depends on kde-base/arts no matter what I set |
| 20 |
in /etc/make.conf? If that's the case I'll just unmerge noatune and forget |
| 21 |
about it. |
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Regards, |
| 24 |
Mick |
Archives