From: | Paul Hartman <paul.hartman+gentoo@×××××.com> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] grub vs grub 2 | ||
Date: | Tue, 14 Feb 2012 23:49:14 | ||
Message-Id: | CAEH5T2NYuOXPA05Zy642brC9ZAB4NHZQHzP0Lhur80=4HJ7tWw@mail.gmail.com | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] grub vs grub 2 by "mike@trausch.us" |
1 | On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 12:52 PM, mike@×××××××.us <mike@×××××××.us> wrote: |
2 | > It also supports partition schemes other than MBR, which is useful |
3 | > since I use GPT on my systems. |
4 | |
5 | FYI Gentoo's GRUB 0.9x in portage has supported GPT for at least 2 or |
6 | 3 years now. I'm using it with GPT partitions and my systems all boot. |
7 | :) |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-user] grub vs grub 2 | "mike@×××××××.us" <mike@×××××××.us> |