| 1 |
On Tue, 16 Sep 2008 20:42:09 +0100, David Leverton wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> > I didn't say they were.You're never going to convince Volker, but you |
| 4 |
> > may well have succeeded in discouraging others from try Paludis. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> On what grounds? "The Paludis developers don't like being lied about, |
| 7 |
> therefore I won't use Paludis"? |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Because you attitude was abrasive and antagonistic. Remember, you may |
| 10 |
have been responding to one person, but you were sending your mail to |
| 11 |
everyone. Read Bo's response for an example of a way to make the point |
| 12 |
far more clearly in a single, reasoned email with no ad hominem attacks. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
> I don't think the sort of person who |
| 15 |
> would use that logic (presumably someone who intends to lie about the |
| 16 |
> developers of his package manager) is the kind of person we want as a |
| 17 |
> user anyway. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
I rest my case. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Neil Bothwick |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
ABORT: Drivel filter is compromised! |
Archives