| 1 |
Indi wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 04:40:02PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> Apparently, though unproven, at 16:00 on Thursday 12 May 2011, Indi did opine |
| 5 |
>> thusly: |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>>> I had 8 users on kde before 3 was deprecated in 2009. |
| 9 |
>>> Now I have zero. It was a harrowing time, switching |
| 10 |
>>> everyone to gnome, finding that is not so hot, finally |
| 11 |
>>> putting them on xfce. If xfce gets a wild hair and changes |
| 12 |
>>> my plan is to dumb down the fluxbox or openbox |
| 13 |
>>> configs I have for my own use, add some scripting and call |
| 14 |
>>> it a day. |
| 15 |
>>> |
| 16 |
>> So why didn't you just leave the users on KDE3? |
| 17 |
>> |
| 18 |
>> |
| 19 |
> For the same reason I didn't leave them on windows 98 se. |
| 20 |
> Yes, it technically "still works" but is far less useful |
| 21 |
> than it was when it was enthusiastically supported by its |
| 22 |
> creators and still considered one of two default choices |
| 23 |
> for DE duty. |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> I'm sorry if this discussion has offended you, Alan. |
| 26 |
> That was certainly not my intent. |
| 27 |
> However, admins with stories like mine are not at all uncommon, |
| 28 |
> and the bottom line is that kde4 lost a lot of users to other |
| 29 |
> DEs. The kde devs clearly bit off more than could chew, but |
| 30 |
> obviously that's water under the bridge now. But to deny it or |
| 31 |
> make excuses now does no service to anyone. "Oops, better not do |
| 32 |
> that again", is what we all hope they learned. We all make mistakes, |
| 33 |
> just don't make the same ones repeatedly! :) |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
+1 |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
Dale |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
:-) :-) |
Archives