| 1 |
On Sonntag 11 Oktober 2009, Dale wrote: |
| 2 |
> Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Sunday 11 October 2009 22:40:31 Peter Ruskin wrote: |
| 4 |
> >> On Sunday 11 October 2009, KH wrote: |
| 5 |
> >>> KH schrieb: |
| 6 |
> >>>> Peter Humphrey schrieb: |
| 7 |
> >>>>> The difficulty is in keeping up with the |
| 8 |
> >>>>> idiom. Personally, I prefer to rely on what I've known for the |
| 9 |
> >>>>> last 60 years or so and to hell with the trendies. |
| 10 |
> >>>>> |
| 11 |
> >>>>> Things like "its" = "belonging to it"; "it's" = "it is". |
| 12 |
> >>>> |
| 13 |
> >>>> Hi, |
| 14 |
> >>>> |
| 15 |
> >>>> how old are you? How is the oldest person on the list? But this |
| 16 |
> >>>> is OT, too. |
| 17 |
> >>>> |
| 18 |
> >>>> kh |
| 19 |
> >>> |
| 20 |
> >>> To correct myself (shame on me). Who is the oldest ... |
| 21 |
> >> |
| 22 |
> >> I'm 71 ... is that old enough? |
| 23 |
> > |
| 24 |
> > Oh dear. I used to call myself an old codger. At a mere sprightly 44, do |
| 25 |
> > I now have to downgrade myself to "still wet behind the ears"? |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> I'm 42 so I got your back. lol |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
wow, from your posts I had you sorted at '24 - max, probably 21' ... |
Archives