1 |
On Thursday, May 08, 2014 02:36:29 PM Andrew Savchenko wrote: |
2 |
> On Wed, 07 May 2014 20:57:29 +0200 J. Roeleveld wrote: |
3 |
> > On 7 May 2014 20:11:10 CEST, Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org> |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> > wrote: |
6 |
> > >On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 08:11:02AM +0200, J. Roeleveld wrote |
7 |
> > > |
8 |
> > >> On Tuesday, May 06, 2014 05:34:52 PM Walter Dnes wrote: |
9 |
> > >> > Unfortunately, mdev != udev. People running RAID have |
10 |
> > >> > |
11 |
> > >> > problems |
12 |
> > > |
13 |
> > >too. |
14 |
> > > |
15 |
> > >> I know it isn't. I just find it strange that LVM can't work |
16 |
> > >> without udev when I see options which configure the LVM-tools |
17 |
> > >> to either double-check udevs actions or even completely bypass |
18 |
> > > |
19 |
> > >> udev: |
20 |
> > > Thanks for the pointer. After turning off the udev-related |
21 |
> > > options in |
22 |
> > > |
23 |
> > >lvm.conf, I'm getting /dev/mapper device nodes as expected. |
24 |
> > |
25 |
> > That is good. Now if only mdadm can be confirmed to work with |
26 |
> > mdev. I could try it on one of my machines. |
27 |
> |
28 |
> And what is the problem with mdadm with mdev? |
29 |
|
30 |
Only that Walter mentioned that people with Raid have issues too. |
31 |
|
32 |
> I have such setup: |
33 |
> nothing special here and works fine. |
34 |
> |
35 |
> Just to speed up device lookup: |
36 |
> |
37 |
> $ grep -v ^# /etc/mdadm.conf |
38 |
> DEVICE /dev/sd* |
39 |
> |
40 |
> And here we go: |
41 |
> |
42 |
> $ cat /proc/mdstat |
43 |
> Personalities : [raid10] |
44 |
> md0 : active raid10 sdd[3] sdf[2] |
45 |
> 2930265088 blocks super 1.2 256K chunks 2 far-copies [2/2] [UU] |
46 |
|
47 |
Do the devices get created correctly in /dev as well? |
48 |
|
49 |
Many thanks, |
50 |
|
51 |
Joost |