Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Phonon + PulseAudio Problem
Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 14:38:00
Message-Id: 201005231637.34059.volkerarmin@googlemail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Phonon + PulseAudio Problem by Barry Jibb
1 On Samstag 22 Mai 2010, Barry Jibb wrote:
2 > On 22/05/10 21:26, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
3 > > On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Nikos Chantziaras<realnc@×××××.de>
4 > > wrote: [snip]
5 > >
6 > >> I don't do professional audio. I have a normal PC. And just like I
7 > >> sometimes use a synth in Windows (I'm just a hobbyist), I'd like to do
8 > >> the same in Linux.
9 > >
10 > > You can; but you have to use special software, because yours is a
11 > > special case. The normal desktop/laptop user does not use a synth.
12 > >
13 > >> ALSA/Pulse needing third-party stuff just to get basics right
14 > >> (acceptable latency; not *ultra* low latency, just acceptable one) is a
15 > >> sign that they're not designed right.
16 > >
17 > > Your definition of "acceptable" is *ultra* low to me, and many others.
18 > > To me acceptable latency means that the audio system does not waste my
19 > > laptop/phone battery.
20 > >
21 > >> And in the end, you know what? Even if OSS4 had a broken design, it's
22 > >> still better, because it works better.
23 > >
24 > > This is your principal problem: you think your use-case is universal,
25 > > and it's not. To me Alsa+PulseAudio works better because it allows the
26 > > battery of my laptop to last for hours while I see a movie with my
27 > > bluetooth headset. With the latencies you want, that's not possible. I
28 > > believe my use-case is more general.
29 > >
30 > >> At least it gets the basics right. Other
31 > >>
32 > >> operating systems are much more advanced in that manner. It's ALSA that
33 > >> holds Linux audio back.
34 > >
35 > > Jack uses ALSA. From the Jack FAQ page (http://jackaudio.org/faq):
36 > >
37 > > <quote>
38 > > Doesn't use JACK add latency?
39 > >
40 > > There is NO extra latency caused by using JACK for audio input and
41 > > output. When we say none, we mean absolutely zero. The only impact of
42 > > using JACK is a slight increase in the amount of work done by the CPU
43 > > to process a given chunk of audio, which means that in theory you
44 > > could not get 100% of the processing power that you might get it if
45 > > your application(s) used ALSA or CoreAudio directly. However, given
46 > > that the difference is less than 1%, and that your system will be
47 > > unstable before you get close to 80% of the theoretical processing
48 > > power, the effect is completely disregardable.
49 > > </quote>
50 > >
51 > > ALSA works great. And for regular users, with PulseAudio both are full
52 > > of awesome awesomeness. For your use-case, you should try Jack.
53 > >
54 > > Regards.
55 >
56 > Can someone unsubscribe me please?!?!?!?!?!?
57
58 READ THE FUCKING HELP IN THE EMAIL HEADER:
59 List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@l.g.o>
60 List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@l.g.o>
61 List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@l.g.o>
62 List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@l.g.o>
63 List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
64 X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@l.g.o
65
66 UNSUBSCRIBE YOURSELF