1 |
On Samstag 22 Mai 2010, Barry Jibb wrote: |
2 |
> On 22/05/10 21:26, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: |
3 |
> > On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Nikos Chantziaras<realnc@×××××.de> |
4 |
> > wrote: [snip] |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> >> I don't do professional audio. I have a normal PC. And just like I |
7 |
> >> sometimes use a synth in Windows (I'm just a hobbyist), I'd like to do |
8 |
> >> the same in Linux. |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> > You can; but you have to use special software, because yours is a |
11 |
> > special case. The normal desktop/laptop user does not use a synth. |
12 |
> > |
13 |
> >> ALSA/Pulse needing third-party stuff just to get basics right |
14 |
> >> (acceptable latency; not *ultra* low latency, just acceptable one) is a |
15 |
> >> sign that they're not designed right. |
16 |
> > |
17 |
> > Your definition of "acceptable" is *ultra* low to me, and many others. |
18 |
> > To me acceptable latency means that the audio system does not waste my |
19 |
> > laptop/phone battery. |
20 |
> > |
21 |
> >> And in the end, you know what? Even if OSS4 had a broken design, it's |
22 |
> >> still better, because it works better. |
23 |
> > |
24 |
> > This is your principal problem: you think your use-case is universal, |
25 |
> > and it's not. To me Alsa+PulseAudio works better because it allows the |
26 |
> > battery of my laptop to last for hours while I see a movie with my |
27 |
> > bluetooth headset. With the latencies you want, that's not possible. I |
28 |
> > believe my use-case is more general. |
29 |
> > |
30 |
> >> At least it gets the basics right. Other |
31 |
> >> |
32 |
> >> operating systems are much more advanced in that manner. It's ALSA that |
33 |
> >> holds Linux audio back. |
34 |
> > |
35 |
> > Jack uses ALSA. From the Jack FAQ page (http://jackaudio.org/faq): |
36 |
> > |
37 |
> > <quote> |
38 |
> > Doesn't use JACK add latency? |
39 |
> > |
40 |
> > There is NO extra latency caused by using JACK for audio input and |
41 |
> > output. When we say none, we mean absolutely zero. The only impact of |
42 |
> > using JACK is a slight increase in the amount of work done by the CPU |
43 |
> > to process a given chunk of audio, which means that in theory you |
44 |
> > could not get 100% of the processing power that you might get it if |
45 |
> > your application(s) used ALSA or CoreAudio directly. However, given |
46 |
> > that the difference is less than 1%, and that your system will be |
47 |
> > unstable before you get close to 80% of the theoretical processing |
48 |
> > power, the effect is completely disregardable. |
49 |
> > </quote> |
50 |
> > |
51 |
> > ALSA works great. And for regular users, with PulseAudio both are full |
52 |
> > of awesome awesomeness. For your use-case, you should try Jack. |
53 |
> > |
54 |
> > Regards. |
55 |
> |
56 |
> Can someone unsubscribe me please?!?!?!?!?!? |
57 |
|
58 |
READ THE FUCKING HELP IN THE EMAIL HEADER: |
59 |
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@l.g.o> |
60 |
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@l.g.o> |
61 |
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@l.g.o> |
62 |
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@l.g.o> |
63 |
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org> |
64 |
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@l.g.o |
65 |
|
66 |
UNSUBSCRIBE YOURSELF |