Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Alecks Gates <fuzzylunkinz@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 broken ?
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 14:41:51
Message-Id: CABMYmBY1LN8nxv-NHzWpSvAkFEnmVjGQj+nWngL8qDVAWqM+dw@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 broken ? by Mick
1 I would be curious to see the results of compiling libreoffice with
2 PORTAGE_TMPDIR on btrfs with compress=lzo.
3 On Feb 19, 2012 9:37 AM, "Mick" <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> wrote:
4
5 > On Sunday 19 Feb 2012 12:57:51 Meik Frischke wrote:
6 > > Am Sonntag, 19. Februar 2012, 12:26:57 schrieb Mick:
7 > > > On Sunday 19 Feb 2012 11:45:25 Neil Bothwick wrote:
8 > > > > On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 12:58:35 +0200, Thanasis wrote:
9 > > > > > > [root@hactar ~ 0]% genlop -t libreoffice
10 > > > > > >
11 > > > > > > * app-office/libreoffice
12 > > > > > >
13 > > > > > > Wed Feb 15 10:23:58 2012 >>> app-office/libreoffice-3.5.0.3
14 > > > > > >
15 > > > > > > merge time: 40 minutes and 52 seconds.
16 > > > > >
17 > > > > > Impressive. What's your hardware configuration, Neil?
18 > > > >
19 > > > > Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600K CPU @ 3.40GHz with 16GB RAM.
20 > > >
21 > > > Hmm ... I've got a 1st generation i7 on my laptop and it is no-where
22 > near
23 > > > that fast. :-(
24 > > >
25 > > > Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU Q 720 @ 1.60GHz with 4G RAM.
26 > > >
27 > > > Sun Jan 29 21:47:46 2012 >>> app-office/libreoffice-3.4.5.2
28 > > >
29 > > > merge time: 1 hour, 34 minutes and 43 seconds.
30 > > >
31 > > > Is it just down to the CPU or are you running /var/tmp/portage on some
32 > > > turbo- charged fs?
33 > >
34 > > IO does really slow down the compilation progress a lot. Having
35 > > PORTAGE_TMPDIR on tmpfs saves about half an hour (compared to reiserfs on
36 > > a 7200rpm disk) for me :
37 > > Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz
38 > > Thu Feb 16 17:42:35 2012 >>> app-office/libreoffice-3.5.0.3
39 > > merge time: 50 minutes and 39 seconds.
40 > >
41 > > With 4GB Ram thats not an option for you though...
42 >
43 > My /var partition is on ext4.
44 >
45 > My CPU is admittedly slower, but even so I wouldn't think that it would
46 > take
47 > more than _twice_ as long as Neil's.
48 > --
49 > Regards,
50 > Mick
51 >