1 |
On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 03:13:50 +0200 |
2 |
Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> Am Samstag, 16. Juni 2012, 19:06:30 schrieb Michael Mol: |
5 |
> > On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 6:56 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > <volkerarmin@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
8 |
> > > Am Samstag, 16. Juni 2012, 23:12:48 schrieb Alan McKinnon: |
9 |
> > >> On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 00:00:04 +0300 |
10 |
> > >> |
11 |
> > >> Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@×××××.com> wrote: |
12 |
> > >> > On 16/06/12 21:27, walt wrote: |
13 |
> > >> > > I guess they figure the desktop will be extinct relatively |
14 |
> > >> > > soon and their customer base will vanish unless they capture |
15 |
> > >> > > the smartphone market. |
16 |
> > >> > |
17 |
> > >> > Ah yes, the death of the desktop PC, which is happening for 15 |
18 |
> > >> > years now. |
19 |
> > >> > |
20 |
> > >> > Are we dead yet? |
21 |
> > >> |
22 |
> > >> Fine comment. |
23 |
> > >> |
24 |
> > >> Yes indeed, Microsoft's *real* cash cow - millions of corporate |
25 |
> > >> desktops running $LATEST_WINDOWS and $LATEST_OFFICE are all |
26 |
> > >> going to die out inthe next year. Not. |
27 |
> > > |
28 |
> > > and in corporate speak that means Windows XP and Office 2003/2007 |
29 |
> > > |
30 |
> > > because they work, they don't get in the way of doing things, the |
31 |
> > > people are trained and nobody needs to smudge around on the |
32 |
> > > screen, |
33 |
> > |
34 |
> > The most effective way I can imagine for keeping me on-task: Force |
35 |
> > me to use a Windows XP workstation. |
36 |
> > |
37 |
> > I won't be using _any_ personal credentials through the web browser |
38 |
> > or any other part of the system. I'm not taking that risk on a |
39 |
> > post-support version of Windows. |
40 |
> |
41 |
> win xp is still supported. |
42 |
> |
43 |
> have you ever dealt with 'standard office workers'? |
44 |
|
45 |
No, I haven't much. I refuse to deal with such people (because if I |
46 |
have to they produce a reaction in me that gets me fired...) |
47 |
|
48 |
But I have dealt with the tools they use |
49 |
|
50 |
> They want to use |
51 |
> the same tools every freaking day. |
52 |
|
53 |
You must mean the typical corporate bespoke app. You know the ones - |
54 |
the apps that wraps the company's entire business logic and makes |
55 |
business possible. |
56 |
|
57 |
Now these apps are atrocious. The worst of the worst you will ever find |
58 |
in the Android App Store is a beautiful model of efficiency compared to |
59 |
the best bespoke corporate app out there. |
60 |
|
61 |
The buttons go in the weirdest places. The workflow is bizarre. They |
62 |
tend to make no bloody sense at all. But people have gotten used to the |
63 |
save button in the lower left corner where it cannot be found, and |
64 |
changing that crashes the entire business process for a week. If anyone |
65 |
thinks I'm kidding, I assure you I am not. |
66 |
|
67 |
|
68 |
> The icons on the same place. The |
69 |
> menu items unchanged. The smallest change throws them off balance. |
70 |
> Going from one office version to another - like 2000-2003 is a |
71 |
> disaster. And while 2007&2010 are superior in every regard these |
72 |
> people are helpless if you confront them with such drastic changes. |
73 |
|
74 |
And an Office upgrade is a slick easy one to do. |
75 |
|
76 |
If Office upgrades cause such havoc, imagine what changing the bespoke |
77 |
stuff does.... |
78 |
|
79 |
> |
80 |
> Now imagine an update to vista, win7 or win8 |
81 |
> |
82 |
> Not everybody is a computer geek. |
83 |
|
84 |
|
85 |
|
86 |
-- |
87 |
Alan McKinnnon |
88 |
alan.mckinnon@×××××.com |