1 |
On Tuesday 01 September 2015 11:55:12 Alan McKinnon wrote: |
2 |
>On 01/09/2015 02:12, covici@××××××××××.com wrote: |
3 |
[...] |
4 |
> |
5 |
>Got it, finally :-) |
6 |
> |
7 |
>fail2ban wants sys-apps/systemd[python(-)], and systemd-219_p112 is the |
8 |
>highest version with an explicit python USE flag. All later versions do |
9 |
>not have the flag at all. |
10 |
> |
11 |
>Your choices are either to have fail2ban fixed to deal with recent |
12 |
>systemd USE, and tolerate the systemd downgrade meanwhile; or to replace |
13 |
>fail2ban with something equivalent |
14 |
|
15 |
That'll be because the systemd python bindings were split into a separate |
16 |
package upstream. But fail2ban already depends on it: |
17 |
|
18 |
systemd? ( $(python_gen_cond_dep '|| ( |
19 |
dev-python/python-systemd[${PYTHON_USEDEP}] |
20 |
sys-apps/systemd[python(-),${PYTHON_USEDEP}] |
21 |
)' 'python*' ) ) |
22 |
|
23 |
So maybe the OP just needs to unmask python-systemd? |
24 |
|
25 |
HTH |
26 |
-- |
27 |
Marc Joliet |
28 |
-- |
29 |
"People who think they know everything really annoy those of us who know we |
30 |
don't" - Bjarne Stroustrup |