| 1 |
Carlos <skyclan <at> gmx.net> writes: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
> > End of dmesg files shows: |
| 6 |
> > usb 2-7: new full speed USB device using ohci_hcd and address 7 |
| 7 |
> > usb 2-7: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice |
| 8 |
> > usb 2-7: USB disconnect, address 7 |
| 9 |
> > usb 2-7: new full speed USB device using ohci_hcd and address 8 |
| 10 |
> > usb 2-7: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
this shows several connection/disconnection cycles |
| 14 |
with address either ..../002/007 or .../002/008 |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
> > crw-rw-r-- 1 root usb 189, 128 Jun 8 23:54 001 |
| 17 |
> > crw-rw-r-- 1 root usb 189, 129 Jun 8 23:54 002 |
| 18 |
> > crw-rw-r-- 1 root usb 189, 130 Jun 8 23:54 003 |
| 19 |
> > crw-rw-r-- 1 root usb 189, 131 Jun 8 23:54 004 |
| 20 |
> > crw-rw-r-- 1 root usb 189, 135 Jun 16 15:35 008 |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
These devices have the absolute path of |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
/dev/bus/usb/002/<001,002,003,005 or 008> |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
> How was the device node chosen? It appears there is no device connected |
| 27 |
> to /dev/bus/usb/002, but rather /dev/bus/usb/008. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
see above |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
> Although the software reports a permissions issue, perhaps the problem |
| 33 |
> is related to a bad choice of device node? |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
I did nothing to create a device node. Kernel config issue? |
| 36 |
Custom udev rule? |
| 37 |
dbus trickery? |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
Hal mystery (need dale on this one....) |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
Dunno, that's why I posted, as to guidance on using |
| 43 |
a motorola (razor) phone with wammu, gammu or any other |
| 44 |
cell based software that works reasonably well with gentoo, |
| 45 |
are all valid snippets of information, of keen interest to me. |
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
|
| 48 |
James |
Archives