| 1 |
Hi Markus |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
Markus Schönhaber wrote on 02/04/07 02:27: |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
> ATM we have the situation where the current stable version of OpenOffice |
| 6 |
> (2.1.0-r1) won't compile (at least on a lot of machines) unless an ~arch |
| 7 |
> version of STLport is installed: |
| 8 |
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=172860 |
| 9 |
> Looking at comments 34 and 37 |
| 10 |
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=172860#c34 |
| 11 |
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=172860#c37 |
| 12 |
> it seems to me there is a conflict in policies but I don't see how this |
| 13 |
> situation should be / will be handled. |
| 14 |
> What is there to do? |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
It seems that we will have to be patient. The various bug reports have |
| 17 |
been marked resolved or duplicate, but as yet there no sign of an |
| 18 |
updated STLport in portage - except for the ~arch STLport-5.1.2. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Bug #172680 indicates that this ~arch version of STLport resolves the |
| 21 |
OpenOffice compilation problem. However, I am very reluctant to use an |
| 22 |
~arch ebuild to compile such a massive (but apparently delicate) ebuild |
| 23 |
as OpenOffice. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
The patches in bug # 172680 mention an STLport-5.1.0-r1, but it has not |
| 26 |
yet appeared in portage. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
There is a request # 173175 to stabilise STLport-5.1.2 in bugzilla. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Oh well, patience is a virtue. Or so they say. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Cheers, Dave |
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives