1 |
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 05:28, Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Neil Bothwick wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> On Thu, 14 Jul 2011 00:31:00 -0500, Dale wrote: |
6 |
>> |
7 |
>> |
8 |
>> |
9 |
>>> * Searching for nvidia* ... |
10 |
>>> [IP-] [ ] media-video/nvidia-settings-**260.19.29:0 |
11 |
>>> [IP-] [ ] x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-**275.09.07:0 |
12 |
>>> root@fireball / # |
13 |
>>> |
14 |
>>> |
15 |
>> |
16 |
>> |
17 |
>>> I'm on the latest of everything that is in the tree. |
18 |
>>> |
19 |
>>> |
20 |
>> No you're not. You are mixing ~amd64 drivers and amd64 settings. It is |
21 |
>> unlikely to be the cause of your crashes, but you've tried all the likely |
22 |
>> causes. |
23 |
>> |
24 |
>> |
25 |
>> |
26 |
>> |
27 |
> |
28 |
> I agree. I don't think it is the settings one either but guess what, I'm |
29 |
> going to try them too. I did nvidia for the drivers but never checked the |
30 |
> settings part. Thanks for pointing that out. |
31 |
> |
32 |
> I'm going to beat this dead horse a little more. BRB |
33 |
> |
34 |
|
35 |
|
36 |
Have you tried a generic video drive to see if the problem is really related |
37 |
to video/kernel? Whenever the video was going crazy because kernel |
38 |
modules/settings/xorg and driver change, I just switch to VESA and see if it |
39 |
works as it should. Then I can blame video drivers. VESA and no xorg.conf |
40 |
was my way of testing it. |
41 |
|
42 |
-- |
43 |
Daniel da Veiga |