1 |
On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 22:29 -0400, Michael Orlitzky wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> Make sure your kernel supports RAID, and RAID5 (they're separate |
4 |
> options). Then emerge mdadm. Once you get it up and running once, you |
5 |
> can dump the current config to /etc/mdadm.conf so you don't have to |
6 |
> assemble it again. Then add mdadm to the boot runlevel. |
7 |
> |
8 |
I'm Ok so far - Raid and Raid5 options are both already compiled into |
9 |
the kernel, and mdadm is in the boot runlevel. |
10 |
|
11 |
> # mdadm --assemble --help |
12 |
> Usage: mdadm --assemble device options... |
13 |
> mdadm --assemble --scan options... |
14 |
> |
15 |
> This usage assembles one or more raid arrays from pre-existing |
16 |
> components. For each array, mdadm needs to know the md device, the |
17 |
> identity of the array, and a number of sub devices. These can be found |
18 |
> in a number of ways. |
19 |
|
20 |
> The md device is either given on the command line or is found listed |
21 |
> in the config file. The array identity is determined either from the |
22 |
> --uuid or --super-minor commandline arguments, from the config file, |
23 |
> or from the first component device on the command line. |
24 |
> |
25 |
> The different combinations of these are as follows: |
26 |
> If the --scan option is not given, then only devices and identities |
27 |
> listed on the command line are considered. |
28 |
> |
29 |
> The first device will be the array device, and the remainder will be |
30 |
> examined when looking for components. |
31 |
> |
32 |
> If an explicit identity is given with --uuid or --super-minor, then |
33 |
> only devices with a superblock which matches that identity is |
34 |
> considered, otherwise every device listed is considered. |
35 |
> |
36 |
> If the --scan option is given, and no devices are listed, then |
37 |
> every array listed in the config file is considered for assembly. |
38 |
> The identity of candidate devices are determined from the config file. |
39 |
> |
40 |
> If the --scan option is given as well as one or more devices, then |
41 |
> Those devices are md devices that are to be assembled. Their identity |
42 |
> and components are determined from the config file. |
43 |
> |
44 |
> If mdadm can not find all of the components for an array, it will |
45 |
> assemble it but not activate it unless --run or --scan is given. To |
46 |
> preserve this behaviour even with --scan, add --no-degraded. Note that |
47 |
> "all of the components" means as many as were present the last time the |
48 |
> array was running as recorded in the superblock. If the array was |
49 |
> already degraded, and the missing device is not a new problem, it will |
50 |
> still be assembled. It is only newly missing devices that cause the |
51 |
> array not to be started. |
52 |
|
53 |
Pardon my additional questions before taking the plunge here. |
54 |
|
55 |
So, given that I have three devices, /dev/sda, /dev/sdb and /dev/sdc, if |
56 |
I run the command mdadm --assemble --scan, would this find all the |
57 |
components and create a /dev/md0 disk without damaging the contents of |
58 |
the original RAID array? |
59 |
|
60 |
The only item in /dev/mapper is th default 'control' entry. There is |
61 |
a /dev/md0 item already listed, but presently when I try to mount it, it |
62 |
reports that it is unable to read the superblock. Would the command |
63 |
above fix this? |
64 |
|
65 |
Where is the config file mentioned in your e-mail, and do I need to edit |
66 |
it first to add the three raid disks? |
67 |
|
68 |
Thanks |
69 |
|
70 |
Jeff |