Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Harry Putnam <reader@×××××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-user] Is Vesa/Uvesa still the way for Frame buffer
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 15:49:02
Message-Id: 8738qsw0y4.fsf@newsguy.com
1 Maybe a poorly worded question but I seem to recall some advances
2 where framebuffering is being handled differently than my old way.
3
4 It could be typified by the kernel line used in grub.conf like this
5 one:
6
7 kernel /vmlinuz root=/dev/sdb3 vga=0x31A video=vesafb:mtrr,ywrap
8
9 Or is that still a viable way to setup the framebuffer, and, of course,
10 making the proper Vesa and /or Uvesa choices at compile time.
11
12 OK, that leads into a second or related part to this question; I'm
13 having a heck of a time finding the uvesa setting in menuconfig.
14
15 A searched for 'vesa', using '/'. Output below. But I'm not finding
16 anything about 'UVESA' at that location.
17
18 I see, under the 'Type' line that they appear to either designate
19 'boolean' or 'Tristate' I know what boolean means in general but not
20 how to apply it here... But have no idea what Type: 'Tristate' might
21 mean.
22
23 I've really scrutinized that area of menuconfig... but not finding any
24 way to say 'y' to FB_UVESA
25
26
27 │ Symbol: FB_VESA [=y] │
28 │ Type : boolean │
29 │ Prompt: VESA VGA graphics support │
30 │ Defined at drivers/video/Kconfig:755 │
31 │ Depends on: HAS_IOMEM [=y] && FB [=y]=y && X86 [=y] │
32 │ Location: │
33 │ -> Device Drivers │
34 │ -> Graphics support │
35 │ (1) -> Support for frame buffer devices (FB [=y]) │
36 │ Selects: FB_CFB_FILLRECT [=y] && FB_CFB_COPYAREA [=y] && |
37 | FB_CFB_IMAGEBLIT [=y] && FB_BOOT_VE │
38 │ │
39 │ │
40 │ Symbol: FB_UVESA [=n] │
41 │ Type : tristate │
42 │ Prompt: Userspace VESA VGA graphics support │
43 │ Defined at drivers/video/Kconfig:737 │
44 │ Depends on: HAS_IOMEM [=y] && FB [=y] && CONNECTOR [=n] │
45 │ Location: │
46 │ -> Device Drivers │
47 │ -> Graphics support │
48 │ (2) -> Support for frame buffer devices (FB [=y]) │
49 │ Selects: FB_CFB_FILLRECT [=y] && FB_CFB_COPYAREA [=y] && |
50 | FB_CFB_IMAGEBLIT [=y] && FB_MODE_HE │
51 │ │
52 │ │
53 │ Symbol: FB_BOOT_VESA_SUPPORT [=y] │
54 │ Type : boolean │
55 │ Selected by: FB_VESA [=y] && HAS_IOMEM [=y] && FB [=y]=y && |
56 | X86 [=y] || FB_INTEL [=n] && HAS │

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Is Vesa/Uvesa still the way for Frame buffer "Canek Peláez Valdés" <caneko@×××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-user] Is Vesa/Uvesa still the way for Frame buffer Bruce Hill <daddy@×××××××××××××××××××××.com>
[gentoo-user] Re: Is Vesa/Uvesa still the way for Frame buffer Harry Putnam <reader@×××××××.com>