1 |
* Joerg Schilling (Joerg.Schilling@××××××××××××××××.de) [29.06.08 13:38]: |
2 |
> Daniel Iliev <daniel.iliev@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> > So, mkisofs.c is the "Program" and cdrtools is a "work based on the |
6 |
> > Program", right? |
7 |
> |
8 |
> If you believe this and what you claimed later, then the GPL would be |
9 |
> a definitely non-free license. See the OpenSource definition at |
10 |
> http://www.opensource.org/docs/osd |
11 |
> |
12 |
> Unfortunately the GPL has not been written in an unambiguous way. This is |
13 |
> why the OSI rated the GPL as non-free for several years. Some years ago, the |
14 |
> FSF explained that the GPL needs to be interpreted in a way that makes it |
15 |
> compliant to the rules at http://www.opensource.org/docs/osd |
16 |
> |
17 |
|
18 |
And that is the bottom of the line in this whole elaborate discussion: |
19 |
The definition of freedom. |
20 |
|
21 |
I *like* the GPL because of that "You have all the freedom, exept to cut |
22 |
down this freedom"-attitude. It is like: I am a tolerant person, but not |
23 |
to intolerant people. And as another example: The german constitution |
24 |
also prohibits the change of the articles that guarantee human rights. |
25 |
|
26 |
Other may find this as a restricting of their freedom, for me it is the |
27 |
only guarantee of the freedom. We are talking about licences, quite |
28 |
the same as laws. They define the last ressort, the line no one should |
29 |
be able to cross. |
30 |
|
31 |
For the academic field a BSD-like licence is a very good choice, because |
32 |
one can publish it to a broad community, yet allow the moneygivers to |
33 |
use it in their commercial, closed product. |
34 |
|
35 |
And if I wrote software, I would not want people to reuse the codeit in |
36 |
closed source. So GPL is the right choice for me, because of the viral |
37 |
and supposed non-free issue. |
38 |
|
39 |
But note: |
40 |
|
41 |
This is *my* choice, and if somone wants to use another license, fine |
42 |
with me. |
43 |
|
44 |
But remember, if more people contibute to a software project, then the |
45 |
license is some essential part of the collaboration. Changing it |
46 |
requires the consensus of *all* people who *ever* contributed to it. |
47 |
|
48 |
So changing a license is always cumbersome. |
49 |
|
50 |
These are general thoughts, not personally againt you, |
51 |
|
52 |
> Jörg |
53 |
> |
54 |
|
55 |
Now my critisism on your decision: |
56 |
I regard the license change as weakening of freedom, reasons are |
57 |
hopefully clear from the above statements. |
58 |
|
59 |
And yes I am radical: |
60 |
|
61 |
I don't like the capitalism, and I found a little socialism in the GPL. |
62 |
And I will fight to protect it! |
63 |
|
64 |
Sebastian |
65 |
|
66 |
-- |
67 |
" Religion ist das Opium des Volkes. " Karl Marx |
68 |
|
69 |
SEB@STI@N GÜNTHER mailto:samson@××××××××××××××××.de |