| 1 |
Hi, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 18:04:56 +0200 |
| 4 |
Mike Kenny <mikekenny@××××××××.net> wrote: |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
> Dec 13 15:56:00 getafix slapd[7156]: bdb(dc=inzanix,dc=com): illegal |
| 7 |
> flag specified to txn_begin |
| 8 |
> Dec 13 15:56:00 getafix slapd[7156]: bdb_txn_get: BerkeleyDB 4.2.52 |
| 9 |
> library needs TXN patch! |
| 10 |
> Dec 13 15:56:00 getafix slapd[7156]: conn=0 op=1 RESULT tag=97 err=49 text= |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> I know this is not specifically a gentoo issue, more LDAP or OX, but I |
| 13 |
> then followed the reference to a required patch on the second last line |
| 14 |
> of messages. I wanted to check what versions of bdb were available, but |
| 15 |
> [... only found one...] |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
As it's clearly LDAP which is complaining here, it would be interesting |
| 18 |
- if that's actually the OpenLDAP compiled on your Gentoo, and if yes, |
| 19 |
- what a re-emerge of OpenLDAP causes and |
| 20 |
- what USE flags you're using for OpenLDAP |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-hwh |
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives