Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: gottlieb@×××.edu
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] did python-r1 improve user experience?
Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 21:56:25
Message-Id: 8761sb6b28.fsf@nyu.edu
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] did python-r1 improve user experience? by Alan McKinnon
1 On Fri, Nov 01 2013, Alan McKinnon wrote:
2
3 > On 01/11/2013 17:43, gottlieb@×××.edu wrote:
4 >> On Fri, Nov 01 2013, Alan McKinnon wrote:
5 >>
6 >>> On 01/11/2013 15:41, gottlieb@×××.edu wrote:
7 >>>> On Thu, Oct 31 2013, gottlieb@×××.edu wrote:
8 >>>>
9 >>>>> On Sun, Oct 27 2013, Mike Gilbert wrote:
10 > I think we can agree that something must have changed on your system in
11 > the last few days, we just have to find it.
12 >
13 > Did you run any portage commands at all that cause changes since
14 > Wednesday? "emerge @preserved-rebuild" and depclean are good candidates,
15 > I often forget about those myself.
16
17 /var/log/portage/elog shows that the last entry was for tar at 30 nov
18 just after midnight. That was the tail end of an update world that
19 included chromium, which ended just before tar. So about 9:30pm on
20 tuesday I started an update world that ended about 3 hours later.
21 I see no activity after that. The emerges after that (all --ask) were
22 aborted when I saw all the reinstalls and then I sent the email to the
23 group.
24
25 >
26 > How about any file at all in /etc/portage that changes since
27 > wednesday?
28
29 None
30
31 newlap gottlieb # ls -l /tmp/ts; find /etc/portage -newer /tmp/ts -ls
32 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Oct 1 00:00 /tmp/ts
33 1190838 4 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Oct 7 10:12 /etc/portage/package.mask
34 1188156 4 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2550 Oct 7 10:13 /etc/portage/package.mask/gnome-3.8
35 1190759 4 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Oct 8 16:15 /etc/portage/postsync.d
36 1190586 4 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 68 Oct 8 16:14 /etc/portage/postsync.d/q-reinitialize
37 1190761 4 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Oct 8 16:15 /etc/portage/bin
38 1190467 4 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 190 Oct 8 16:14 /etc/portage/bin/post_sync
39
40
41 > Or /var/lib/portage/world*?
42 newlap gottlieb # ls -l /var/lib/portage/world*
43 -rw-r--r-- 1 root portage 1048 Oct 15 19:27 /var/lib/portage/world
44 -rw-r--r-- 1 root portage 1098 Sep 9 17:21 /var/lib/portage/world~
45 -rw-r--r-- 1 root portage 0 Oct 15 19:27 /var/lib/portage/world_sets
46
47 I do appreciate your efforts and this hunting was instructive for me, but
48 I can't see you spending any more time on it. I must have done
49 something wrong (beyond not including the output of the update world
50 with 38 reinstalls).
51
52 The status now is that update world only wants to update poppler,
53 util-linux, icu, and python-exec. I have not re- synced. I imagine it
54 is quite safe to do this update (perhaps the python-exec will then
55 trigger more later).
56
57 I will first update a less important machine that also includes
58 python-exec and if nothing terrible occurs will update the main machine.
59
60 I do feel bad for time others have spent on what was clearly some
61 unknown user error on my part.
62
63 thanks again,
64 allan

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] did python-r1 improve user experience? Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>