| 1 |
On Friday 02 July 2010 02:54:33 Nicolas Sebrecht wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hi all, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> I'm often stucked by the current policy in this mailing list changing |
| 5 |
> the 'Reply-To' header to the mailing list address. Most mailing lists I |
| 6 |
> use don't do that. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> It is usually better and prefer the "answer to all" policy as it permit |
| 9 |
> to be notified of an answer without having to track the whole mailing |
| 10 |
> list. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> What do you think about changing of policy? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
We have been over this and over this and over this endless times over the past |
| 17 |
5 years. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
For every stated reason why reply-to munging is considered harmful there is an |
| 20 |
equal and opposite reason why it isn't. And every time we discuss this we just |
| 21 |
leave the system as is. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
You should learn to deal with it. There is no correct answer. There is only an |
| 24 |
awareness of how the list you are using works. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |
Archives