1 |
On Sonntag 28 Juni 2009, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
2 |
> On Sunday 28 June 2009 05:47:23 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: |
3 |
> > On Sonntag 28 Juni 2009, Alex Schuster wrote: |
4 |
> > > Volker Armin Hemmann writes: |
5 |
> > > > On Sonntag 28 Juni 2009, Alex Schuster wrote: |
6 |
> > > >> Or keep 4.3 as default, I don't think you could run into problems. |
7 |
> > > > |
8 |
> > > > he will over time. If you switch default compiler emerge -s world has |
9 |
> > > > to be done. |
10 |
> > > |
11 |
> > > According to Alan McKinnon's (and my own experience), this is not |
12 |
> > > necessary, unless there are ABI changes. But there were none between |
13 |
> > > 4.1 and 4.3. |
14 |
> > > |
15 |
> > > http://www.mail-archive.com/gentoo-user@l.g.o/msg83724.html |
16 |
> > > |
17 |
> > > Wonko |
18 |
> > |
19 |
> > you don't have to compile between 4.2.0 and 4.2.1 - sure. |
20 |
> > |
21 |
> > But with 4.2 to 4.3 I only got a stable system after compiling everything |
22 |
> > with the same compiler. So whatever Alan says - I know how borked my box |
23 |
> > was with half of the libs compiled by one compiler and the rest by the |
24 |
> > other. |
25 |
> |
26 |
> That's interesting. I run ~amd64 here and update almost daily - so I got |
27 |
> practically every gcc version that hit the tree since 3.3 at some stage. |
28 |
> And I never had the problem you describe. |
29 |
|
30 |
yeah, me too ;) |
31 |
|
32 |
> |
33 |
> It's likely that you have a set of libs that indeed *are* sensitive to |
34 |
> different gcc versions, and I'm not using those libs (so I don't get the |
35 |
> problems). |
36 |
|
37 |
probably, yes. |
38 |
|
39 |
> |
40 |
> I wonder if it would be worth the effort to investigate this further and |
41 |
> isolate problem packages. |
42 |
|
43 |
I don't really think so. emerge -e system or emerge -e world aren't such hard |
44 |
to type - and you can do it in the background. Just open all apps you plan to |
45 |
use in the next couple of hours ;) |