| 1 |
Am Montag, 09.02.2015 um 08:49 |
| 2 |
schrieb Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On 09/02/2015 00:50, Peter Humphrey wrote: |
| 5 |
> > On Sunday 08 February 2015 17:31:33 wabenbau@×××××.com wrote: |
| 6 |
> >> Am Sonntag, 08.02.2015 um 15:30 schrieb Alan McKinnon |
| 7 |
> >> <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>: |
| 8 |
> >>> I actively seek out and use fonts with a stroked zero (or at least |
| 9 |
> >>> with a dot in the middle of the zero. I can never remember if the |
| 10 |
> >>> digit is the fat one or the thin one |
| 11 |
> >> |
| 12 |
> >> It's the same with me. :-) |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> > I'd have thought it was easy enough: the zero is the same width as |
| 15 |
> > the other numerals. The O is bigger. |
| 16 |
> > |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> I have a horrible suspicion all 3 of us wear spectacles :-) |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
I have three spectacles. One for reading phone and books, one for screen |
| 22 |
reading and other indoor activities and one for outdoor orientation. :-) |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
> And it's been a few years since I could spot a difference of 2 pixels |
| 25 |
> wide! |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
If I wear the right glasses for the respective distance I luckily have |
| 28 |
a relative good eyesight. But I must let adjust my glasses every year |
| 29 |
by an optician because of aging. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Nevertheless I prefer easy readable fonts and big screens. They just |
| 32 |
causing less stress. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Regards |
| 35 |
wabe |
Archives