Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: "»Q«" <boxcars@×××.net>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: openoffice 3 broken?
Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2008 03:15:32
Message-Id: 20081102211222.3c453c71@bellgrove.remarqs.net
In Reply to: RE: [gentoo-user] openoffice 3 broken? by Adam Carter
1 On Sun, 2 Nov 2008 20:34:17 +1100
2 Adam Carter <Adam.Carter@×××××××××.au> wrote:
3
4 > > I've got OpenOffice (compiled), v3.0.0 here. It appears broken.
5 > > I haven't tried a lot of things, but this little RTF file
6 > > gets it wedged right
7 > > away: the console that started it says:
8 > >
9 > > error - missing word count in dictionary file
10 > > Hash Manager Error : 4
11 > >
12 > > So I'm guessing there's a problem in a spell checker. Where would I
13 > > look to solve that?
14 >
15 > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=242020
16 >
17 > You need to emerge --sync again (there's an update to the ebuild, but
18 > no version increment IIRC) and rebuild openoffice.
19
20 <whine>
21 I really wish they wouldn't do that, especially for hang or crash
22 bugs. I know people without the problem don't want to recompile OOo,
23 but it's annoying to have to watch bugzilla or the changelog to see if
24 the ebuild has been fixed.
25 </whine>
26
27 --
28 »Q«
29 Kleeneness is next to Gödelness.

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-user] Re: openoffice 3 broken? Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@×××××.de>