From: | Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Now Know Why Portage Is So Slow | ||
Date: | Fri, 26 May 2006 19:34:14 | ||
Message-Id: | 20060526202326.395c3c7c@krikkit.digimed.co.uk | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] Now Know Why Portage Is So Slow by Lord Sauron |
1 | On Fri, 26 May 2006 10:02:25 -0700, Lord Sauron wrote: |
2 | |
3 | > > you should try the ~x86 version of portage which has many |
4 | > > improvements: $ echo "sys-apps/portage ~x86" |
5 | > > >> /etc/portage/package.use $ emerge portage |
6 | > |
7 | > Just a question, but there's got to be a reason why it's still in ~x86. |
8 | |
9 | Yes, it's less than 30 days old. ~arch does not mean unstable, it means |
10 | still-in-testing. |
11 | |
12 | |
13 | -- |
14 | Neil Bothwick |
15 | |
16 | WinErr 014: Keyboard locked - Try anything you can think of. |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-user] Now Know Why Portage Is So Slow | Iain Buchanan <iaindb@××××××××××××.au> |