Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Re: Do we have to build gcc with fortran now?
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 18:19:19
Message-Id: 20110623191608.1696dbc1@zaphod.digimed.co.uk
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Re: Do we have to build gcc with fortran now? by pk
1 On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 19:23:58 +0200, pk wrote:
2
3 > It refuses to die because it's still very useful in certain niche areas
4 > (hpc, numerical computing etc.) where "modern" languages doesn't cut
5 > it... :-)
6
7 Or so the Fortran programmers with jobs to protect will tell you...
8
9 You'll be telling us there's still a place for Cobol next :-O
10
11
12 --
13 Neil Bothwick
14
15 "Mmmm, trouble with grammer have I, yes?" - Yoda

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Re: Do we have to build gcc with fortran now? Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Re: Do we have to build gcc with fortran now? Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org>
[gentoo-user] Re: [OT] Re: Do we have to build gcc with fortran now? walt <w41ter@×××××.com>