From: | Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Re: Do we have to build gcc with fortran now? | ||
Date: | Thu, 23 Jun 2011 18:19:19 | ||
Message-Id: | 20110623191608.1696dbc1@zaphod.digimed.co.uk | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Re: Do we have to build gcc with fortran now? by pk |
1 | On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 19:23:58 +0200, pk wrote: |
2 | |
3 | > It refuses to die because it's still very useful in certain niche areas |
4 | > (hpc, numerical computing etc.) where "modern" languages doesn't cut |
5 | > it... :-) |
6 | |
7 | Or so the Fortran programmers with jobs to protect will tell you... |
8 | |
9 | You'll be telling us there's still a place for Cobol next :-O |
10 | |
11 | |
12 | -- |
13 | Neil Bothwick |
14 | |
15 | "Mmmm, trouble with grammer have I, yes?" - Yoda |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Re: Do we have to build gcc with fortran now? | Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> |
Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Re: Do we have to build gcc with fortran now? | Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org> |
[gentoo-user] Re: [OT] Re: Do we have to build gcc with fortran now? | walt <w41ter@×××××.com> |