Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Messed up - how do I emerge coreutils once coreutils is gone?
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 17:16:13
Message-Id: 200804281847.42701.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Messed up - how do I emerge coreutils once coreutils is gone? by Stroller
1 On Monday 28 April 2008, Stroller wrote:
2 > On 27 Apr 2008, at 11:55, Alan McKinnon wrote:
3 > > ...
4 > > Microsoft's stated reason for this is to annoy users so much that
5 > > they will annoy 3rd party developers who will write software that
6 > > doesn't need root to install. Hmmmm.
7 >
8 > Is this not - substantially - the same as the reason for the Portage
9 > QA warning messages?
10 > ;)
11
12
13 hehehe, well spotted :-)
14
15 Superficially similar, but very different in implementation. Portage
16 tells you about stuff that could be improved, it can be disabled by
17 those who don't know what to do about it and the user has the choice.
18
19 UAC just gets in your face like an annoying fruit fly buzzing round your
20 nose and won't go away. The user does not have a choice worth a damn
21 and is not in control
22
23
24 --
25 Alan McKinnon
26 alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com
27
28 --
29 gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
RE: [gentoo-user] Messed up - how do I emerge coreutils once coreutils is gone? John Krukoff <jkrukoff@××××.com>