| 1 |
Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Friday 30 June 2006 16:55, Rumen Yotov wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Don't wanna say anything, but all of you could just search -dev |
| 4 |
>> ML-archives. There are two alternate package-managers in development. |
| 5 |
>> Some sparks about dev/user overlays,sunrise-overlay,GWN etc. etc. |
| 6 |
>> Not seen such turmoil in latest 3 years (and IMHO most things are |
| 7 |
>> personal). No flames intended, just info. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Is there a point to this? Because I'm not sure I caught it... (Note that AFAIK |
| 10 |
> both of those alternative package managers wish to be part of Gentoo.) |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
Hi, |
| 13 |
Yes but the question is which *one* will prevail (maybe it'll be better |
| 14 |
if two or even three are used, based on user preferences etc.). |
| 15 |
The way to go (as it's going now) is to standardize on the ebuild format |
| 16 |
- the *data* in portage and open place for technical merits. |
| 17 |
IMO this is just a temporary problem from which something better will |
| 18 |
emerge, i truly hope so. Lets hope *everybody* will learn from it ;) |
| 19 |
PS:BTW what you/others think of user-representatives idea? |
| 20 |
Richard/Neil&others could be ones, both have technical&personal qualities. |
| 21 |
See prev./last GWN. There's a voting thread somewhere in forums.g.o |
| 22 |
Rumen |
Archives