1 |
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 1:18 PM, skiarxon <skiarxon@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> |
4 |
> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 8:46 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann |
5 |
> <volkerarmin@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
6 |
>> |
7 |
>> On Tuesday 31 May 2011 17:05:06 Alan Mackenzie wrote: |
8 |
>> > Hi, all. |
9 |
>> > |
10 |
>> > Sabayon Linux is said to be "derived" from Gentoo. Yet, reading reviews |
11 |
>> > of Sabayon (from www.distrowatch.org), I fail to see any similarity |
12 |
>> > between G and S; S is a binary distribution, doesn't have portage, and |
13 |
>> > doesn't look like having much flexibility. |
14 |
>> > |
15 |
>> > Purely out of curiosity, what is the nature of this "derivation"? |
16 |
>> |
17 |
>> they use the portage tree and a gentoo like /etc. Just for example. AFAIR |
18 |
>> of |
19 |
>> course. |
20 |
> |
21 |
> You can think Sabayon as another Gentoo overlay (you can actually install |
22 |
> the overlay in your Gentoo installation). It provides binary packages and |
23 |
> many other things to help the user, still though you can use emerge and all |
24 |
> the features (if not all most) Gentoo has to offer. All in all is a pretty |
25 |
> good job. |
26 |
> |
27 |
|
28 |
In fact I believe you can use layman to add the sabayon overlay, |
29 |
emerge entropy (Sabayon's binary package manager) and start using it. |
30 |
(I'm sure it's not entirely that straightforward, but that's the |
31 |
executive summary) |