1 |
On 2011-04-01, Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
2 |
> On Fri, 1 Apr 2011 20:40:33 +0000 (UTC), Grant Edwards wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> How do I convince portage that viewvc does not require an external web |
5 |
>> server and I don't want apache or webappconifg installed? |
6 |
> |
7 |
> It's a web app, |
8 |
|
9 |
Yes, it can be a "web app". It can also be run stand-alone using its |
10 |
own web server with no external dependancies other than python and |
11 |
support for the VC system you want to use. It seems a bit un-Gentoo |
12 |
to allow only the former option rather than give the user a choice. |
13 |
|
14 |
> so I'm not surprised it depends on a web server. |
15 |
|
16 |
I am, since it doesn't require a separate web server, it shouldn't |
17 |
depend on a separate web server. |
18 |
|
19 |
> Try putting apache in /etc/portage/profile/package.provided. |
20 |
|
21 |
That seems like a kludge that's likely to cause problems later. ISTM |
22 |
that the ebuild is broken. I'll have to take a shot at fixing the |
23 |
ebuild so it doesn't depend on apache and webapp-config unless you |
24 |
install it USE flags telling it you want it to use apache and |
25 |
webapp-config. |
26 |
|
27 |
-- |
28 |
Grant |