Archives
Archives
| From: | Ian Zimmerman <itz@××××××××××××.org> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | [gentoo-user] Re: some spectre v1 code in 4.15.2 | ||
| Date: | Tue, 13 Feb 2018 01:32:12 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20180213013153.3h7u6gz75cwiarrs@matica.foolinux.mooo.com | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-user] Re: some spectre v1 code in 4.15.2 by Nikos Chantziaras |
||
| 1 | On 2018-02-13 03:13, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > Apparently, and contrary to what people (me included) wrote here in |
| 4 | > the past, BPF JIT is the secure option, and the interpreter is the |
| 5 | > insecure one. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | Do you have a reference for this? It sounds strange indeed. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | -- |
| 10 | Please don't Cc: me privately on mailing lists and Usenet, |
| 11 | if you also post the followup to the list or newsgroup. |
| 12 | To reply privately _only_ on Usenet, fetch the TXT record for the domain. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| [gentoo-user] Re: some spectre v1 code in 4.15.2 | Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@×××××.com> |